| Niyamam AI

Displaying 19601 - 19605 of 21901

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdussalam.K.P. et al regarding suit for realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 290 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-09-05

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sulaiman et al vs Jafar et al regarding Injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 266 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-09-01

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Yahu vs Pathummu et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 310 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-08-31

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K. Drisya vs Vinod Kumar regarding money realisation

Civil Suit - Money Realisation

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 7 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-08-31

4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Razak K vs M/s Cement Traders et al regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:38/2017

Tirur

2018-08-31

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9648

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to non-payment of court fees or necessary deposits, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to provide sufficient evidence supporting claims or defenses resulted in dismissal of numerous cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Absence

Many cases were dismissed simply because plaintiffs were absent during hearings, lacking representation.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs often did not issue necessary notices to defendants, leading to defaults and dismissal.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Due to Absence

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?