| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18536 - 18540 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Parameswaran et al vs Devayani et al regarding suit for register the documents.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 336 OF 2015

2019-01-11

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Hamsa regarding payment satisfaction

Execution Petition

EP 134/2016

Malappuram

2019-01-11

2 years, 7 months, 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Ushakumari regarding enforcement of decree.

Execution Petition

EP 375/2015

Malappuram

2019-01-11

3 years, 3 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Govindan vs Kakkassery Mathew Josen et al regarding EP 224/2017

Execution Petition

KLML130007792017

Malappuram

2019-01-19

1 years, 3 months, 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Koyakkutty vs Thottunkandi Avaran regarding eviction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 358 OF 2014

Tirur

2019-01-24

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or the financial standing of respondents.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Failure to Take Action

Several cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking necessary steps in their petitions, like issuing notices.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

The absence of petitioners in court contributed to a significant number of case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Take Action

Absence of Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?