| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18271 - 18275 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between secratray vs Santhosh Nalukandathil et al regarding EP 315/2018

Execution Petition

KLML130008872018

Malappuram

2019-06-12

0 years, 6 months, 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Biju Pallippurath et al regarding execution proceedings

Execution Petition

EP 317/2018

Malappuram

2019-06-12

0 years, 6 months, 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hajara vs Chandran.P.P. regarding Rent Control

Rent Control

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 21 OF 2018

Tirur

2019-06-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between NIrmarathur Co-operative Bank vs Nelliyali Rasak et al regarding EP 184/2017

Execution Petition

KLML130006172017

Malappuram

2019-06-10

1 years, 10 months, 5 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratray vs Viswanathan Kandayi regarding EP 457/2018

Execution Petition

KLML130010822018

Malappuram

2019-06-14

0 years, 5 months, 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees or batta, causing their petitions to be dismissed for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence regarding the means of respondents led to many cases being dismissed.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Non-Representation of Plaintiff

Numerous cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence or failure to appear in court.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Many petitions were dismissed for the failure to take steps to issue necessary notices to respondents.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation of Plaintiff

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?