| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17486 - 17490 of 22045

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between St. Francis Xavier Church et al vs Sajan. N.P. regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 624/2022

Ernakulam

2025-03-29

approximately-9 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Unnikrishnan vs M.X. George regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No .533/2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between P.T.Abraham vs Antony regarding settlement of matter

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 603/2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. V6 Autotech Solution (i) Pvt. Ltd vs Basil K Eldhose regarding suit transfer

Civil Suit

O.S No . 41/2022

Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-03-29

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Prasanna Prathapan vs The Corporation of Cochin et al regarding dismissal for default.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 289/2019

Ernakulam

2025-03-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9715

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiff did not provide required documentation to support their claims or establish the basis for their petition.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Applications were dismissed for failure to pay the necessary fees for processing or issuing notices.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Case dismissed due to the petitioner's non-appearance in court during scheduled hearings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence on Financial Means

Petitioners failed to provide evidence establishing the means of the respondents to pay the debt or judgment.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence on Financial Means

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?