| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1116 - 1120 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Preethy Agencies vs Ammas Enterprises regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. 413/2024

Kottayam

2025-12-20

approximately-2 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aleyamma @ Ajitha vs Ajith P Markose et al regarding settlement at Mediation

Civil Suit

O.S No. 593/2021

Kottayam

2025-12-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between T P Goplalan et al vs Arun Prabhakaran regarding mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 747/2020

Kottayam District

2025-12-20

approximately-5 years 1 month 20 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Mr. Madhu K.K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. 10/2025

Kottayam

2025-12-20

approximately-9 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ashok Babu vs Mary Joseph et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 95/2019

Kottayam

2025-12-20

approximately-6 years 10 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs often failed due to non-payment of necessary fees, including batta and notice issuance costs.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many petitions were dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner during hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims or to prove means to pay.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Petitioners often did not take necessary procedural steps such as notifying defendants or issuing documents.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?