| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 7716 - 7720 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Vettom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs Vikraman et al regarding loan repayment

Execution Proceeding - Loan Repayment

EP 270/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-05

1 year, 9 months, 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Basheer et al vs Saidalvi et al regarding partition and future profits

Civil Suit - Partition and Profits Realization

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 302 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-06-03

2 months 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Velayudhan Thekinkattil regarding loan closure

Civil Suit

EP 63/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-03

0 years 3 months 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Velayudhan Thekinkattil regarding loan closure

Civil Suit - Declaration

EP/66/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-03

0 years, 3 months, 1 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Vettem Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Abdurahiman regarding payment dispute

Civil Suit - Payment Dispute

EP 366/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-03

1 year, 8 months, 7 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to produce essential documents required to support their claims or petitions.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence of Means

Many cases were dismissed due to inadequate evidence showing the respondents' financial capacity to fulfill obligations.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Necessary Fees

Plaintiffs frequently did not pay required fees, leading to dismissals for default or failure to issue notices.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

Many petitions were dismissed as plaintiffs failed to appear or represent themselves adequately during hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Lack of Evidence of Means

Non-Payment of Necessary Fees

Lack of Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?