| Niyamam AI

Displaying 696 - 700 of 21853

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between V.P. Jawahar vs Afsal B regarding offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

ST-24/2023

Vaikom

2025-06-10

approximately-6 years 8 months 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vijayamma et al vs Kanakan et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No.253/2023

Vaikom

2025-06-09

approximately-1 year 19 days

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Anitha Siva Prasad et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.178/2024

Vaikom

2025-06-16

approximately-1 year 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Saritha et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.166/2024

Vaikom

2025-06-16

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Renjini Prasanthan et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.173/2024

Vaikom

2025-06-16

approximately-1 year 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9626

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Court Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees or batta, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs could not present adequate evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Dismissing cases often occurred due to the plaintiff's absence during court hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs frequently neglected to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Court Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?