Private Individual

Peoples Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd. is the petitioner, represented by its Secretary, while Ragin. T is the respondent. The case involves the dismissal of an execution petition due to the respondent's non-appearance.

Shibu is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against R. Rajagopalakrishnan and others. The case arises from a dispute over property ownership and related claims.

This case involves Calicut City Service, Co-operative Bank Limited as the petitioner and Sabeena and others as respondents regarding the satisfaction of a decree. The matter has been settled between the parties.

The plaintiff, Mohanan P.D, filed a suit for declaration regarding the validity of a title deed after the original was reported destroyed. The defendant, State Bank of India, admitted the plaint claim in their written statement.

Canara Bank filed a suit against Fighter World Aqua Traders and Sheena Kumari for the recovery of loans amounting to ₹9,72,445.28. The bank claims that the defendants defaulted on their loan repayments.

The plaintiff, Sasilal P, is seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Vinod K and Kadalundi Gramapanchayath, for allegedly encroaching upon his property and constructing a compound wall. The defendants deny the allegations and assert that the road in question is public property.

Canara Bank filed a suit against Ashique Ressel and others. The suit was not pressed and was dismissed by the court.

The General Manager of Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against P. K. Prem Ravi Varma. The decree holder is represented, and the court has ordered the transmission of the decree for execution.

The case involves Ace Finlease Pvt Ltd as the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against the respondents, Jinu and Ali K, who are the judgment debtors. The court has ordered the decree to be transmitted for execution.

Calicut City Service, Co-operative Bank Limited filed an execution petition against Prasannan. The court dismissed the petition as the judgment debtor was not residing within its jurisdiction.