Private Individual

The plaintiffs, Abraham Philipose and Mariyamma Abraham, are seeking an injunction against the defendants, John Mathyas, George Mathyas, and Jerin Mathyas, who are obstructing their use of a road. The case involves disputes over property boundary and easement rights.

Raju George filed a suit against Kottayam Municipality and P.R.Suresh Babu seeking to prevent the construction of a waste disposal plant on his property. The plaintiff claimed that the construction would obstruct his access and cause health hazards.

Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd. filed a complaint against Rajimol P V under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant subsequently petitioned to withdraw the complaint.

Geetha Ravindran, the decree holder, filed an execution petition against Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The court concluded the hearing on January 4, 2025, without representation from the petitioner.

Balakrishnan V filed an Execution Petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The case was about the enforcement of a decree, but the decree holder was not represented in court.

Raghavan Adoor filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and others. The court closed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.

Rajila V, represented by Chandrasekharan P, filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The decree holder was absent during the hearing.

Vijayalakshmi P K is the decree holder and has filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition as the decree holder was not represented and no steps were taken.

The case involves O P Vijayan as the petitioner who is seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition due to the absence of representation from the decree holder.

Ramesh Kumar is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The petition was heard and the court closed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.