Private Individual

The complainant is M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co(P)Ltd represented by K R Sibu. The case involves allegations under U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was ultimately withdrawn.

The case involves Anna rubbers and Kottayam District Mini Industrial Estate Co Operative Society Ltd. against Baburaj regarding property disputes. The defendants allegedly threatened the plaintiffs with removal from the property.

The case involves Anu K Kurian and K A Kurian as plaintiffs seeking a prohibitory injunction against defendant Reghunathan T K. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant has trespassed on their property and installed utilities without permission.

The case involves a restoration petition filed by The Co-Operative Departmental Employees Co-Op. Society Ltd No.K.294 against N.Sivadasan and S Beena. It was presented in the context of civil procedure.

The case involves a restoration petition filed by the Co-operative Departmental Employees Co-operative Society Ltd No K 294 against Radhika T P and others. The petition was represented and a receipt was produced.

The case involves a restoration petition filed by the Co-operative Departmental Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. No. K 294 against Abraham Mathew and K M Lissy. The petition seeks the court's intervention under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The case involves a minor plaintiff, Prarthana Ranjith, represented by her mother. The suit is about the plaintiff's lack of interest in proceeding, leading to its dismissal.

The petitioner is Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank, Limited, and the respondent is Mini. K. The case involves a petition for execution that has been settled with full satisfaction endorsed.

Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Limited filed a petition against Muhammed Mirdas. T. V and others regarding the satisfaction of an award. The matter was settled and full satisfaction was endorsed.

The case involves Calicut City Service, Co-operative Bank Limited, as the petitioner and Rajan. P as the respondent regarding the confirmation of a sale. The Decree Holder represented in court with no objections received to set aside the sale.