State Government

The case involves the State of Kerala as the petitioner and Sajikumar S as the respondent. A penalty was imposed and paid by the sureties.

The State of Kerala is the petitioner against Liju B and Samuval T regarding the imposition of a penalty. The accused surrendered and was ordered to pay a penalty.

K Hamsa is the plaintiff seeking the realization of an amount due from the defendants, which include the Executive Engineer and the State of Kerala represented by the District Collector. The court has noted that the matter is settled and has dismissed the suit as not pressed.

The plaintiff, Swathi Thirunal Saraswathy Mandaapam Charitable Society, represented by D.Vijaya Kumar, filed a case against the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram and several individuals. The suit was dismissed for default as the defendants were not ready for evidence.

The plaintiff, Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine, alleges that the defendants unlawfully demolished her compound wall and trespassed on her property. The case revolves around her request for a mandatory injunction to restore her property and prevent further unauthorized actions by the defendants.

M R Harikumar, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants to prevent the demolition of his building, which he claims was owned by his late father. The defendants argue that they have the right to demolish the building to widen the road, asserting that the plaintiff has no title over the property.

David Pul has filed a suit against the State of Kerala and various government officials regarding the resurvey of his property boundaries, alleging that the resurvey was conducted improperly and that his property boundaries were incorrectly fixed. The defendants contend that the resurvey was executed correctly in accordance with the law.

Petitioner seeks eviction of respondents from a shop room for his intended paint and hardware business.