Similar Cases
Based on: OS 353/2021 — Case between C. S. I Ascension Church et al vs Geethakrishnan. P. K regarding Execution Petition
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
E.P159/2024
Case between Jerusalem Mar Thoma Church vs M/s Hotline Electronics Sales and Service Centre et al regarding execution petition.
The case involves an execution petition filed by the Jerusalem Mar Thoma Church against M/s Hotline Electronics Sales and Service Centre. The court dismissed the execution petition as not pressed.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P 107/2025
Case between Church of South India Trust Association et al vs Biji Aji et al regarding Execution Petition.
The case involves the Church of South India Trust Association as the decree holder and Biji Aji as the judgment debtor. The execution petition was filed and closed as satisfied.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
E.P 248/2024
Case between CSI Ascension Church vs M/s Nedumparambil Nidhi Ltd regarding Execution Petition
CSI Ascension Church represented by its church wardens, Mr. Amos Abraham Thomas and Mrs. Jeeja Dilip Cherian, filed this execution petition against M/s Nedumparambil Nidhi Ltd. The court addressed the decree satisfaction and additional payment required.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
E.P. 69/2024
Case between C. S. I Ascension Church et al vs Geethakrishnan. P. K regarding execution of decree
The decree holders include C. S. I Ascension Church represented by Amos Abraham Thomas and Jeeja Dilip Cherian. The judgment debtor is Geethakrishnan. P. K. The execution petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP 69/2024
Case between C. S. I Ascension Church et al vs Geethakrishnan. P. K regarding Execution Petition
C. S. I Ascension Church and its Church Wardens are the decree holders seeking execution against Geethakrishnan. P. K. The court dismissed the execution petition as not pressed.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP. 69/2024 in OS.353/2021
Case between C.S.I Ascension Church, Ascension Junction vs Geethakrishnan P K regarding Execution petition
C.S.I Ascension Church is the decree holder represented by Amos Abraham Thomas and Jeeja Dilip Cherian. Geethakrishnan P K is the judgment debtor. The execution petition was dismissed as not pressed by the court.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E. P. 69/2024
Case between C. S. I Ascension Church et al vs Geethakrishnan. P. K regarding Execution Petition
The case involves the C. S. I Ascension Church represented by Amos Abraham Thomas and Jeeja Dilip Cherian who are the decree holders. The execution petition against Geethakrishnan. P. K was dismissed as not pressed.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP. 69/2024 in OS.353/2021
Case between C.S.I Ascension Church et al vs Geethakrishnan P K regarding execution of decree
The case involves the C.S.I Ascension Church, represented by its Church Wardens, seeking execution of a decree against the Judgment Debtor Geethakrishnan P K. The execution petition was dismissed by the court as not pressed.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP.No. 113/2020 in O.S.155/2018
Case between St.Mary’s Church, Kudavechoor et al vs Purushothaman et al regarding Execution Petition
The case involves St.Mary’s Church, Kudavechoor as decree holders and Purushothaman and others as judgment debtors concerning an execution petition. The execution petition was not pressed and was dismissed by the court.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
O.S No.392/2024
Case between C.S.I Ascension Church, Kanjikuzhy et al vs ICICI Bank Ltd. et al regarding compromise petition
The case involves a suit filed by C.S.I Ascension Church against ICICI Bank Ltd. and its associated parties. The court addressed a compromise petition filed by both parties.
Civil Suit
O. S. No.357 /2019
Case between Jomon M.C. vs Manarcadu St.Pauls C.M.S. Church regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
The plaintiffs, Jomon M.C., M.K.Joseph, and Mathew V.Jose, filed a suit against the defendant, Manarcadu St.Pauls C.M.S. Church. The suit was dismissed by the court on grounds that it was not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 747/2018
Case between Mathew Uthup vs Holy Family Catholic Church et al regarding family vault allotment.
Mathew Uthup filed a suit against Holy Family Catholic Church and its trustees seeking to allot a family vault for his deceased parents, which he claims was promised in 1988. The defendants denied any obligation, claiming the suit is barred by limitation and that the plaintiff has no right to a family vault.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 150/2022
Case between Shinu P Kuriakose vs Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church et al regarding dismissal for default.
Shinu P Kuriakose is the plaintiff who initiated the case against multiple defendants including the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no instructions were submitted by the counsel.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 300068/2023
Case between C.S.I. Ascension Church vs P K Geethakrishnan regarding restoration of suit
C.S.I. Ascension Church filed a petition for the restoration of a suit which was previously closed. The case involves matters pertaining to civil procedures.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RCP 3000068/2017
Case between Church of South India Trust Association et al vs Joseph Chavara regarding dismissal of petition
The Church of South India Trust Association, represented by several individuals, filed a petition against Joseph Chavara. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Unknown
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 342/2021
Case between Stanley Kurian et al vs The Arch Eparchy of Kottayam et al regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs include Stanley Kurian and several others, while the defendants include The Arch Eparchy of Kottayam and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RCP/300004/2025
Case between Church Of South India Trust Association et al vs Ludy Educational Services Private Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
The petitioners, including the Church Of South India Trust Association, filed a rent control petition against Ludy Educational Services Private Ltd. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed based on the plaintiff's memo.
Rent Control Petition
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 364/2025
Case between Church of South India Trust Association et al vs Aji Cheiran regarding dismissal of suit
The case involves the Church of South India Trust Association as the plaintiff and Aji Cheiran as the defendant. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 182/2023
Case between St.Mary’s Church (Kallara Puthenpalli) vs Sojan regarding mediation settlement.
This case involves St.Mary’s Church (Kallara Puthenpalli) as the plaintiff and Sojan as the defendant. The matter was settled in mediation with terms agreed upon by both parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 135/2023
Case between Sojan vs St.Marys Church et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Sojan is the plaintiff who filed a suit against St.Marys Church and others. The suit was ultimately dismissed as it was not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
E.P. No.23/2020
Case between Balakrishan V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Balakrishan V is the decree holder and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd along with its director and his spouse are judgment debtors in this execution petition. The court considered the petition and closed it due to the decree holder's absence.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P.24/2020 in OS No. 248/2018
Case between Rajeevan N vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Rajeevan N is the decree holder and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. along with its directors are the judgment debtors. This execution petition was considered by the court and subsequently closed due to non-representation by the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 25/2020
Case between Reshmitha M vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Reshmitha M is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court found the decree holder absent and closed the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 48/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Chandrasekharan P is the petitioner seeking execution against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The execution petition was heard and closed due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 49/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Chandrasekharan P is the petitioner and decree holder in an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and others. The court ordered the closure of the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented and defects not being cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 50/2021
Case between Renuka P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Renuka P is the decree holder in this execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The petition was closed as the decree holder was not represented and the defect was not cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 53/2021
Case between Ramesh Kumar vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Ramesh Kumar is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The petition was heard and the court closed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 54/2021
Case between O P Vijayan vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
The case involves O P Vijayan as the petitioner who is seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition due to the absence of representation from the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 55/2021
Case between Hilda Fernandez @ Hilda Lawrence vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Hilda Fernandez is the petitioner seeking execution of the decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its director K.N. Rajeev. The execution petition was closed due to the decree holder not being represented and the defect not being cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 56/2021
Case between Kalyani C vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Kalyani C is the petitioner seeking enforcement of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and other respondents. The court ruled that the decree holder was not represented and closed the execution petition due to lack of action.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 57/2021
Case between Pushpa P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
This case involves an execution petition filed by Pushpa P against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The decree holder was not represented in court during the hearing.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 65/2021
Case between Vijayalakshmi P K vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Vijayalakshmi P K is the decree holder and has filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition as the decree holder was not represented and no steps were taken.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P.66/2021
Case between Meenakshi Amma vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding execution petition
The case involves Meenakshi Amma as the petitioner and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. along with other defendants. The petition was for the execution of a decree.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 67/2020
Case between Rajila V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Rajila V, represented by Chandrasekharan P, filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The decree holder was absent during the hearing.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 67/2021
Case between Chithra Sreedharan vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Chithra Sreedharan is the decree holder seeking execution against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The case revolves around the enforcement of a decree in the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 69/2020
Case between Raghavan Adoor vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Raghavan Adoor filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and others. The court closed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 96/2020
Case between Balakrishnan V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Balakrishnan V filed an Execution Petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The case was about the enforcement of a decree, but the decree holder was not represented in court.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 97/2020
Case between Geetha Ravindran vs Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Geetha Ravindran, the decree holder, filed an execution petition against Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The court concluded the hearing on January 4, 2025, without representation from the petitioner.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP 99/2020
Case between Chandrashekharan P vs K N Rajeev et al regarding Execution Petition
Chandrashekharan P is the decree holder in this execution petition against K N Rajeev and others. The case involves the execution of a judgment, but the decree holder was not represented in court.
Execution Petition
Dismissed
EP No. 100/2020
Case between Vattakandy Sreedharan vs Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Vattakandy Sreedharan is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree. The respondents include Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. and other directors.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP 103/2020
Case between O P Vijayakumar vs K N Rajeev et al regarding decree execution.
The case involves O P Vijayakumar as the decree holder and K N Rajeev along with others as judgment debtors. The decree holder was not represented, and it appears that necessary steps were not taken, leading to the closure of the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP 300124/2024
Case between M/s Trinity Traders vs Mehaboob regarding settlement of a matter.
This case involves M/s Trinity Traders represented by Joseph Varghese and Mehaboob. The matter is settled with both parties signing a memorandum of agreement.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
E.P.137/2023
Case between Saji T Kurian vs James Abraham regarding Execution Petition
The case involves decree holders Saji T Kurian and Aniyamma Saji seeking execution of a decree against judgment debtor James Abraham. The execution petition was considered on 31st January 2025.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
E.P. No.105/2023
Case between K K Madhavan vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
K K Madhavan is the decree holder seeking execution against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and other defendants. The court found that the decree holder has not taken steps necessary for the proceedings.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P.158/2019
Case between EMART vs Mohammed Sherif et al regarding Execution Petition
The case involves a decree holder, EMART, filing an execution petition against the judgment debtors, Mohammed Sherif and Bajaj Finance Ltd. The court considered the petition and decided to close it due to lack of steps taken.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P.108/2021
Case between North Malabar Gramin Bank vs Manojkumar K R et al regarding execution of decree
North Malabar Gramin Bank is the decree holder, and Manojkumar K R and Mohandas K M are the judgment debtors. This execution petition pertains to the enforcement of a prior decree.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P. No. 82/2022
Case between Abdul Rahman vs Ajayakumar regarding execution petition
Abdul Rahman filed an execution petition against Ajayakumar. The petition came for consideration and was closed by the court.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P. No. 78/2023
Case between Canara Bank vs Shajimon K.R et al regarding Execution petition
Canara Bank is the plaintiff represented by its Branch Manager Aswin Joseph. The defendants are Shajimon K.R and Smitha Shajimon, who face an execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won