| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2376 - 2380 of 2443

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secretary vs Thazhathe peediyekkal Iqbal et al regarding decree debt

Civil Suit

EP 200/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-03-20

0 years, 6 months, 21 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Theyassanchery Kumaran et al regarding debt payment

Civil Suit - Debt Payment

EP/300254/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-03-20

0 years 4 months 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Hamza Poozhithara et al regarding default of payment

Civil Suit

EP 9/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-03-18

0 years, 2 months, 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Baiju Pallat regarding default dismissal

Unknown

EP 10/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-03-18

0 years, 2 months, 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Nakulan regarding debt recovery

Execution Petition - Debt Recovery

EP 49/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-03-17

0 years, 1 months, 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

218

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required court fees or batta, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff During Hearings

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear or represent themselves in court.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to produce sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-Pressing of Claims

Many cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs did not actively pursue or press their claims in court.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff During Hearings

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Pressing of Claims

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?