Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 211 - 215 of 669

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank No.F.770 vs Somasundaran Asarivalappil regarding loan closure

Civil Case

EP 74/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-08-25

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank No.F.770 vs Somasundaran Asarivalappil regarding Loan satisfaction

Civil Suit

EP 73/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-08-25

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Kavilakath Mohanan regarding debt satisfaction

Civil Suit - Debt Satisfaction

EP 28/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-08-23

0 years 6 months 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd et al vs Nayikara Rajeev regarding debt payment

Civil Case - Debt Payment

EP 30/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-08-23

0 years, 6 months, 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Shereef vs Yoonas regarding loan repayment

Civil Suit - Recovery of Money

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 46 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-08-21

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

71%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 669 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.1 years

Settlement Likelihood 22%

Common Winning Factors:

Agreement (in 33 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 32 cases)
Loan Application (in 28 cases)
Acknowledgment of Debt and Security (in 23 cases)
Statement of Accounts (in 20 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 476
Defendant Won: 133

133

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed to comply with necessary batta payments for their petitions, leading to dismissal.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Cases dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence or non-representation significantly impacted outcomes.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many plaintiffs failed to present adequate evidence to prove claims or defendants' means to pay debts.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Court Fees

Failure to submit required court fees resulted in the rejection of plaintiffs' suits.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Provided

Non-Payment of Court Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?