| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1981 - 1985 of 2442

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Abdul Salam vs Alavi regarding money dispute

Money Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 246 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-12-15

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Salam vs Alavi regarding money suit

Money suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 250 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-12-15

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd. vs Mas Pharmaceuticals et al regarding money

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 59 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-12-14

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thennal Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sharafudheen regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 153/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-12-14

0 years, 5 months, 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chalambattu Abdul Latheef vs Sulaiman.N. regarding money suit settlement in Adalath

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 322 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-12-13

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Supporting Claims

Many cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence proving the defendants' ability to pay debts.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Numerous petitions were dismissed as plaintiffs were absent or failed to have representation in court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Dismissals frequently occurred due to plaintiffs not providing necessary documentation to support their claims.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Supporting Claims

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Failure to Produce Required Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?