| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1511 - 1515 of 2449

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s Nutricreams Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s Neelagiri Food Products regarding recovery of outstanding dues.

Civil Suit

OS.358/2024

Perumbavoor, Kerala

2025-11-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between N. C. Thomas vs Reji Joseph regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS.85/2022

Perumbavoor

2025-11-21

approximately-5 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Speed Pack vs A A Marketings regarding outstanding payment

Civil Suit

O. S. No.330/2024

Perumbavoor

2025-11-22

approximately-4 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Metro Bankers vs Vishnu K et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O. S. No.347/2019

Perumbavoor

2025-11-29

approximately-7 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Binda Karnan Pvt. Ltd. vs Chellayil Udhesan regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS.93/2025

2025-11-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple cases were dismissed for plaintiffs failing to pay the required batta necessary for proceeding.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff During Hearings

Many petitions were dismissed because the plaintiff was absent during scheduled court hearings or representations.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence of Means to Pay

Several cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence proving the defendant's means to fulfill the financial obligation.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs' failure to submit necessary documents to support their claims.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff During Hearings

Lack of Evidence of Means to Pay

Failure to Produce Required Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?