| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 116 - 120 of 1355

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Maker Village, Kerala Technology and Infrastructure Zone, Kinfra Hi Tech park, Kalamassery vs M/s Wahoo Technologies private limited et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 341/2022

Ernakulam

2024-08-21

approximately-2 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The South Indian Bank Limited vs Mr. Shiraz M.S et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.1177/2023

Ernakulam

2024-08-22

approximately-6 years 7 months 4 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Polachan Maniamkot vs Mohammed Shanif P.S regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1322/2022

Ernakulam

2024-08-30

approximately-7 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sri. Mohandas N.S. vs Sri. Jolly T.T. regarding Realization Of Money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.933/2017

Ernakulam

2024-08-30

approximately-7 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd vs Gijo P. Mathews regarding Realization Of Money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1002/2022

Ernakulam

2024-08-30

approximately-4 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

83%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,355 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 11%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 193 cases)
Statement of Account (in 187 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 173 cases)
Loan Application (in 128 cases)
Postal receipt (in 101 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1120
Defendant Won: 173

173

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary batta fees, leading to dismissal of their petitions due to default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence of Means

Plaintiffs could not demonstrate that defendants had the financial means to pay the decree debt.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during key court hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Lack of necessary documentation from plaintiffs resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence of Means

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Failure to Produce Required Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?