| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 596 - 600 of 1355

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Anna Agencies et al regarding suit for realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 500/2020

Ernakulam

2025-12-17

5 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between PREFire Solutions vs Ernakulam Tourist Bungalow et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 774/2017

2025-12-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs M M Mathew regarding realization of money for services rendered.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1026/2022

Ernakulam

2025-12-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Asmi Abdul Jaleel regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1222/2024

2025-12-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Mushar Naisam et al regarding suit for money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1333/2024

Ernakulam

2025-12-06

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

83%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,355 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 11%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 193 cases)
Statement of Account (in 187 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 173 cases)
Loan Application (in 128 cases)
Postal receipt (in 101 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1120
Defendant Won: 173

173

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the necessary fees for court procedures, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs were not present during hearings or trials.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence about the means to pay the decree debts.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Numerous cases were dismissed as plaintiffs' counsel did not actively pursue the claims in court.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?