| Niyamam AI

Displaying 56 - 60 of 2443

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs M/s.Riya Marketing et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1004/2022

Kollam

2025-07-04

approximately-5 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajesh.R.K.Nair vs Aji Chandran regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1015/2022

Kollam

2025-07-05

approximately-3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Nizamudeen @ Nissamudeen regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 76/2023

Kollam

2025-07-05

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Farsana.M.S et al regarding Realisation of Money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 183/2024

Kollam

2025-07-05

approximately-8 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Minimol vs Sheeba Rahul regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 398/2019

Kollam

2025-07-07

approximately-7 years 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

218

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to remit required batta, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence regarding defendants' means to pay debts resulted in dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Plaintiffs were often absent from court or lacked representation during proceedings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Pay Court Fees

Dismissals frequently occurred due to plaintiffs not paying necessary court fees.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Failure to Pay Court Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?