Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 171 OF 2015

Case between A.P.Sudakaran vs Sulthan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2018-08-31
Duration
3 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

case_20260117_094545_batch_696b0cef6748c1.37048998_2_b2f5b7a9.pdf
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Sudakaran sought permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent obstruction of a way he used for 24 years for ingress and egress to his property by defendants Sulthan and Nafeesa.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from obstructing plaintiff's access to his property via the way used for 24 years.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent prohibitory injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff proved his case through affidavit and documents, demonstrating his right to the pathway, resulting in the injunction against defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit decreed the defendants to be permanently restrained from obstructing or committing any wastage to the plaint B schedule property and interfering with plaintiff's easementary rights.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

A.P.Sudakaran (56 years) Asariparambil House, Cheriyamundam amsom, Tirur Taluk. PIN - 676 103

Defendants

Sulthan (37 years) Nelliyali House Palapra Nafeesa (34 years) D/o Palapra Aboobacker, Nelliyali House Viswabharan (56 years) Asariparambil House, Cheriyamundam amsom, Tirur Taluk. PIN - 676 103

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are permanently restrained from obstructing or committing waste to the pathway and interfering with plaintiff's easementary rights.
Evidence:
The suit decreed the defendants to be permanently restrained from obstructing or committing any wastage to the plaint B schedule property and interfering with plaintiff's easementary rights.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's ownership of the property
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal transfer of property rights
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
District Collector petition for related issue
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Acknowledgement Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirmation of petition submission
Reference:
A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C3
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C4

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 08/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases