Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 358 OF 2015

Case between Kadiyamu vs Saidalavi Haji et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. NIMMI.K.K., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2018-08-04
Duration
2 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Kadiyamu filed a suit for injunction against defendants Saidalavi Haji, Pathumma, P.K.Abdul Razak and Rumanath. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. Plaintiff not present. Today posted for plaintiff's evidence. D1 present. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kadiyamu (65 years) Pottachola House, Ponmundam amsom desom, Tirur Taluk, PIN - 676 106

Defendants

Saidalavi Haji (67 years) Kudukkengal House, Ponmundam amsom desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, PIN - 676 106 Pathumma (60 years) Kudukkengal House, Ponmundam amsom desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, PIN - 676 106 P.K.Abdul Razak (Age not specified years) Kudukkengal House, Ponmundam amsom desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, PIN - 676 106 Rumanath Haji (Age not specified years) Kudukkengal House, Ponmundam amsom desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, PIN - 676 106

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought injunction against defendants
Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Plaintiff not present. Today posted for plaintiff's evidence. D1 present. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 08/04/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases