Case between Kunhimarakkar. C.P et al vs Kumar et al regarding eviction for reconstruction

Case Summary

Petitioner seeks eviction of respondent to reconstruct the building for own occupation, due to alleged non-payment of rent and refusal to vacate after lease termination.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court granted the petitioner's request for eviction to enable reconstruction of the building for the petitioner's intended commercial activities.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Vacant possession of the property for reconstruction

Case Type

Rent Control Petition - Eviction

Final Judgment

No

Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioner's bonafide need for reconstruction and the respondent's failure to fulfill lease obligations.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965 as follows: a) The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today. b) The respondent shall pay costs of the petition.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kunhimarakkar. C.P (47 years) Chekkinte Purakkal Veedu, Vakkad, Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom& Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 502

Defendants

Kumar (55 years) Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom & Post Near T.M.G College North, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Vacant possession of the property for reconstruction

Evidence:

The petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965 as follows: a) The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Issued on 08-01-2016 requesting enhancement of rent and vacation of the room.

Reference:

A1(a)

Document Type: Reply Notice