Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 440 OF 20 13

Case between Muhammed Ajmal Hidayathulla vs Beeran Koya et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-03-07
Duration
5 years 9 months
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff aged 43 filed a suit for injunction against defendants Beeran Koya and Suhara which was dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed Ajmal Hidayathulla (43 years) S/o Moothedath Kunhi Moosa, P.O. Pachattiri, Pachattiri amsom Pariyapuram desom, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Beeran Koya (50 years) S/o Kollachali Kunhapputty, Thenhipalam amsom desom & Post, Tirurangadi Taluk. Suhara (45 years) D/o Pandikasala Moideen kutty, Pachattiri amsom Paravanna desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk. Vettom Grama Panchayath (Age not specified years) Rep. By Its Secretary, P.O. Vettom, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Relief sought for injunction
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Thu, 03/07/2013 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Municipality

Similar Cases