Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 7 OF 2014

Case between Muhammad Kutty et al vs Khamarudheen et al regarding possession of the leased property

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, L.L.B.
Order Date
2018-02-05
Duration
3 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners seek vacant possession of a room they purchased and leased out to the first respondent for repair work, now intending to start a hardware shop.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Petition allowed under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, directing respondents to vacate the property and pay costs to petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the leased property
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners demonstrated a bonafide need for the property to start a hardware shop and provided evidence of non-satisfaction through an ex-parte proceeding.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed under section 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammad Kutty (58 years) Niramaruthoor Amsom, Desom, Tirur Taluk Kallungal Sulaiman (45 years) Niramaruthoor Amsom, Desom, Tirur Taluk Ashraf (Age not specified years) Manayil House, Vailathoor Amsom Desom, Madirassery, Chavakkad Fathima (49 years) Maniyath Puthupparambil House, Madirassery Amsom Thrikkanapuram desom, Ponnani Taluk

Defendants

Khamarudheen (49 years) Pallippat Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam Amsom, Thalakkadathoor Desom, Tirur Taluk Riyas (34 years) Thayyil House, Niramaruthoor Amsom, Desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Vacant Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
To put the petitioners in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
Ext.A1, Ext.A2 series, Ext.C1, Ext.C2, Evidence from PW1
Relief Type: Cost Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to realise the cost of the petition from the respondents.
Evidence:
Ext.A1, Ext.A2 series, Evidence from PW1

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ownership transfer document for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice to vacate the property sent to the first respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2 series
Document Type: Commissioner's Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report on the status of the property and possession.
Reference:
Ext.C1, Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 02/07/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases