Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 439 OF 2014

Case between M/s TBT & Company vs The Central Bank of India et al regarding fee realization for concurrent audit

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-02-27
Duration
3 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A case filed by M/s TBT & Company seeking payment of fees for a concurrent audit conducted at the Central Bank of India branches. The plaintiff alleged non-payment of fees for the audit period and lack of facilities provided during the audit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay the amount of Rs. 48,000 for the concurrent audit done with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Payment of amount towards fee with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit - Fee Realization
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully demonstrated the completion of the audit assignment, non-payment of fees, lack of facilities provided during the audit, and lack of objections from the defendants regarding the audit reports.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendants are directed to pay amount of Rs. 48,000/- towards the fee for the concurrent audit done by the plaintiff during the period of July 2013 to October 2013 with interest.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

T.B. Thomas (Age not specified years) JC Buildings, Muppini, Edakkara.P.O., Nilambur

Defendants

The Central Bank of India et al (Age not specified years) Corporate Office, NCL Building, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai 400 051

Reliefs

Relief Type: Fee Realization
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directed defendants to pay Rs. 48,000 with interest and costs
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The defendants are directed to pay amount of Rs. 48,000/- towards the fee for the concurrent audit done by the plaintiff during the period of July 2013 to October 2013 with interest.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the appointment of plaintiff for concurrent audit
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Email copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Email correspondence related to the audit work
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Registered Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent for fee recovery
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Not available
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 02/24/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases