Case Summary
The petitioners, children of Karimbanakkal Kunhimoideenkkutty, sought vacant possession of a rented room from the respondent for conducting a hotel business, claiming bonafide need due to relocation and commercial viability of the location.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the petition schedule property
Case Type
Civil Suit - Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioners' bonafide need for the room to conduct a hotel business and that the respondent had alternative accommodation, leading to the eviction order.
The court found the petitioners' bonafide need for the room to conduct a hotel business and that the respondent had alternative accommodation, leading to the eviction order.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed...under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Moideen (57 years)
Iringavoor amsom, Vaniyannur desom, Tirur Taluk
Alavi (Age not specified years)
Iringavoor amsom, Vaniyannur desom, Tirur Taluk
Muhammed (62 years)
Iringavoor amsom, Vaniyannur desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Mangodi Ashraf (Age not specified years)
Tirur Amsom, Kott desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Vacant possession of the petition schedule property
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Nil
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Nil
Reference:
Document Type:
Nil
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Nil
Reference: