Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 235 OF 2015

Case between Muhammed Ashraf et al vs Abdul Latheef et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-02-07
Duration
2 years 11 months 6 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs seek permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants for obstructing plaintiff's peaceful possession of a property and encroaching into it.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from obstructing plaintiff's possession or encroaching the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff proved the exclusive ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property supported by cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff granting permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed Ashraf (53 years) Thirunnavaya amsom, Grama Panchayath, Edakkulam desom, Tirur Taluk Pottammal Kunhikoyamu Haji (Age not specified years) Thirunnavaya amsom, Grama Panchayath, Edakkulam desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Abdul Latheef (35 years) Thirunnavaya amsom, Grama Panchayath, Edakkulam desom, Tirur Taluk Velladath Moideen (54 years) Thirunnavaya amsom, Grama Panchayath, Edakkulam desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restrain defendant from obstructing peaceful possession or encroaching property
Evidence:
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff granting permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishing exclusive ownership by plaintiff of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting evidence for plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting evidence for plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court exhibit submitted by Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court exhibit submitted by Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 02/07/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases