Case Summary
Plaintiff sought permanent injunction to prevent defendants from demolishing a wall and obstructing passage through the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to establish ownership and usage rights over the property.
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to establish ownership and usage rights over the property.
Judgment Evidence:
The defendants herein is restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from demolishing the wall situated on the eastern side of plaint A schedule property, or from making any obstruction in the pass and re pass of the plaintiff through plaint B schedule property with vehicular access.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Chenganasseri Sainaba (46 years)
Post Valakkulam, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Kunnathedath Hussain (32 years)
Kuncharathodi, Mundiyanthara, Post Valakkulam, Tirur Taluk
Yahkhoob (37 years)
Perumanna amsom, desom, Charalkunu Road, Post Valakkulam, Tirur Taluk
Idris (32 years)
Perumanna amsom, desom, Charalkunu Road, Post Valakkulam, Tirur Taluk
Anas (29 years)
Perumanna amsom, desom, Charalkunu Road, Post Valakkulam, Tirur Taluk
Edavannavalappil Samad (40 years)
Perumanna amsom, desom, Charalkunu Road, Post Valakkulam, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
To prevent the defendants from demolishing the wall and obstructing passage through the property
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Established ownership of the plaint A schedule property
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Smt. Sreekala Sudheesh, Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C1
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Smt. Sreekala Sudheesh, Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C2