Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
EP 68/2017

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Peranthan Kummarampil regarding default enquiry

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-11-13
Duration
0 years, 8 months, 10 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank filed a petition against Peranthan Kummarampil. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not present for the enquiry.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The EP was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not present for the enquiry.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner is not present. Not ready for enquiry. Hence EP is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank (1 years) The Secretary, PO. Kuttippala

Defendants

Peranthan Kummarampil (0 years) Klari, Paalachiramaadu, PO. Edarikode

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Not mentioned
Evidence:
Petitioner is not present. Not ready for enquiry. Hence EP is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Mon, 03/20/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases