Case Summary
Four petitioners residing in Kundil House seek declaration that Abdul Hakkim is not a protected tenant and they need possession of the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rental property possession to petitioners
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Compromise between parties, agreement on non-protected tenant status, bonafide need of petition schedule property, and vacant possession agreement.
Compromise between parties, agreement on non-protected tenant status, bonafide need of petition schedule property, and vacant possession agreement.
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner and respondent filed IA.2568/2017 compromising the petition. The respondent has agreed that he is not protected tenant and petitioner is in bonofide need of petition schedule property. The respondent has further agreed to give vacant position of the petition schedule room on or before 4-12-2017.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Fathima (51 years)
Kundil House, Ponmundam amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Muhammed Afeekh (33 years)
Kundil House, Ponmundam amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Ahique (21 years)
Kundil House, Ponmundam amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Hamna (16 years)
Kundil House, Ponmundam amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Abdul Hakkim.P (47 years)
Pokklath House, Thanalur amsom, desom, Post Meenadathoor, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition schedule property possession to petitioners
Evidence:
Petitioner and respondent filed IA.2568/2017 compromising the petition. The respondent has agreed that he is not protected tenant and petitioner is in bonofide need of petition schedule property. The respondent has further agreed to give vacant position of the petition schedule room on or before 4-12-2017.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Compromise petition
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement between parties leading to the grant of possession.
Reference:
IA.2568/2017