Case Summary
Petitioner, Mohammed Moideen, sought eviction of respondent from a building in order to run a restaurant and catering service.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction and vacant possession of the building
Case Type
Eviction under Kerala Building (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed directing the respondents to give vacant possession of the shop rooms to the petitioners within three months from the date of this order under 11(4)(ii) of the Act.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Mohammed Moideen (37 years)
Cheracham Veettil House, Thalakkad amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. P.O.B. P.Angadi 676 102.
Defendants
P. Aboobacker (41 years)
uthiyakath House, Purathoor amsom Muttannur desom, P.O.Muttannur 676 561, Tirur Taluk.
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Eviction and vacant possession of the building
Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed directing the respondents to give vacant possession of the shop rooms to the petitioners within three months from the date of this order under 11(4)(ii) of the Act.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Finding of alterations and damages to the building
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Evidence of changes done to the building reducing its utility
Reference:
Ext.C1