Case Summary
The suit involved a dispute over the partition of the plaint schedule property between the children of Manayath Valappil Raman.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of plaint B schedule property
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reasons not clearly mentioned.
Reasons not clearly mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 7 equal shares by mets and bounds. 2. Each plaintiff is entitled to get 1 share, out of 7 shares in plaint B schedule property. 3. Each defendant is entitled to get 1 share, out of 7 shares in plaint B schedule property.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Karthyayani (63 years)
Punnasseri Veedu, P.O.Kavanchery
Kalyani (60 years)
Ammattil Veedu, P.O.Poilisseri
Sreemathi @ Leela (47 years)
Thottiyattil Veedu, Muthoor, Tirur
Defendants
Gopi (58 years)
Valamaruthoor amsom desom, P.O.Valamaruthoor, Tirur Taluk
Prabhakaran (55 years)
Valamaruthoor amsom desom, P.O.Valamaruthoor, Tirur Taluk
Rajan (43 years)
Valamaruthoor amsom desom, P.O.Valamaruthoor, Tirur Taluk
Yasoda (61 years)
Punnasseri Veedu, P.O.Valamaruthoor, Tirur Taluk
Manayath Valappil Bhaskaran (59 years)
Manayath Valappil Appunni (60 years)
Valamaruthoor amsom desom, P.O.Valamaruthoor, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Division of plaint B schedule property into 7 equal shares for the plaintiffs and defendants.
Evidence:
The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 7 equal shares by mets and bounds.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Copy of Purchase Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the plaint B schedule property.
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
True copy of Document
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the plaint B schedule property.
Reference:
A2
Document Type:
True copy of Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the plaint B schedule property.
Reference:
A3
Document Type:
Unknown
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Not mentioned in the judgment.
Reference:
Nil
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Dated 18-6-2016.
Reference:
C1
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Dated 18-6-2016.
Reference:
C2