Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 390 OF 2015

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Rajesh Kumar et al regarding money realization

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-10-20
Duration
2 years 11 months 27 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

case_20260114_230614_batch_6967d387e661b8.02865485_62_4ce101a6.pdf
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against the defendants seeking to recover a loan amount along with accrued interest due to non-repayment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendants must pay the sum of Rs. 1,07,556/- to the plaintiff bank along with interest and costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Money Recovery with Interest
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is hereby directed to pay the sum of Rs. 1,07,556/- to the plaintiff with 12% per annum from the date of suit till today and thereafter interest of 6% per annum. 2. The defendants shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kerala Gramin Bank (Age not specified years) Tanalur - Branch.

Defendants

Rajesh Kumar (11 years) Chittilappilli House, Vattathani, P.O.Keraladheswarapuram, Keraladheswarapuram amson), Tirur Taluk. Devarajan (48 years) Maliyekkal House, Vattathani, P.O. Tanalur, Tanalur amsom, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Recovery with Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants directed to pay sum of Rs. 1,07,556/- with interest to plaintiff
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is hereby directed to pay the sum of Rs. 1,07,556/- to the plaintiff with 12% per annum from the date of suit till today and thereafter interest of 6% per annum. 2. The defendants shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the loan application by the first defendant.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the loan agreement.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to loan delivery details.
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Agreement for Retail Credit Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to credit card agreement.
Reference:
A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document where defendant acknowledges the debt and security.
Reference:
A5
Document Type: Application seeking Restructuring facility
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to loan restructuring.
Reference:
A6
Document Type: Restructured Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document sanctioning restructured loan.
Reference:
A7
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the loan agreement.
Reference:
A8
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Loan delivery details document.
Reference:
A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document of acknowledgment of the debt and security.
Reference:
A10
Document Type: True Copy of Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified accounts showing details of entry under Bank Book Evidence Act.
Reference:
A11
Document Type: True Copy of Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified accounts showing details of entry under Bank Book Evidence Act.
Reference:
A12

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 10/23/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases