Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 354 OF 2015

Case between M/s Bharathi Auto Finance vs Musthafa et al regarding money realization

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-09-27
Duration
2 years 5 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff filed a suit seeking realization of money borrowed by the defendants which they failed to repay as per agreement, including handing over property deed as security.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay the outstanding amount with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Payment of Rs. 1,80,000 with 6% interest per annum till realization
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence of the transaction, while the defendants failed to substantiate their defense.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the suit is decreed as follows: 1. Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,80,000/-( Rupees one lakh and eighty thousand only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum till realization of the suit. 2. Defendant is directed to pay the costs of the suit

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Bharathi Auto Finance (Age not specified years) Door No.26/175L, 1st floor, Nusrath Complex, Naduvilangadi, Tirur amsom desom, Post Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Musthafa (41 years) P.O.Vellarakkadu, PIN - 680 584, Vellarakkadu Village & desom, Thalappalli Taluk, Thrissur Dist. Beevathukutty (35 years) P.O.Vellarakkadu, PIN - 680 584, Vellarakkadu Village & desom, Thalappalli Taluk, Thrissur Dist.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Payment of Rs. 1,80,000 with 6% interest per annum till realization
Evidence:
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence of the transaction, while the defendants failed to substantiate their defense.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of agreement between parties for repayment
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice with Postal Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendants demanding repayment
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Unclaimed cover with A/D Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of unclaimed notice
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Property Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Security provided by defendants for the transaction
Reference:
A4

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 09/22/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases