Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 252 OF 2015

Case between Pathummu Umma et al vs Parayil Mammu et al regarding declaration

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-09-16
Duration
2 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Pathummu Umma filed a suit seeking declaration, but due to lack of representation, the suit was dismissed by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed by the court due to the absence of representation from the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Declaration
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for declaration. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Pathummu Umma (70 years) Parayil House, Athavanadu amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. P.O.Karippol. PIN 676 522

Defendants

Parayil Mammu's wife (47 years) Athavanadu amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. P.O.Karippol. PIN 676 522 Khamarunnisa (30 years) Athavanadu amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. P.O.Karippol. PIN 676 522 Safiya (24 years) Athavanadu amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. P.O.Karippol. PIN 676 522 Shafeek (22 years) Athavanadu amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. P.O.Karippol. PIN 676 522 Thoufeek (20 years) Athavanadu amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. P.O.Karippol. PIN 676 522

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking declaration
Evidence:
Suit for declaration. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 09/16/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases