Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 325 OF 2014

Case between Kunnath Rukkiya vs Kalparambil Muhammedali's children regarding Injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-09-13
Duration
3 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Kunnath Rukkiya, 70 years old, filed a suit for injunction against defendants Salahudheen and Musthafa, seeking court's intervention to prevent certain actions. However, the plaintiff was absent during the final hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction filed by the plaintiff was dismissed with costs due to the absence of the plaintiff during the final hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for Injunction. Counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kunnath Rukkiya (70 years) Thalakkad amsom desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Salahudheen (48 years) Thalakkad amsom desom, Tirur Taluk Musthafa (43 years) Thalakkad amsom desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for injunction dismissed with costs due to absence during final hearing
Evidence:
Suit for Injunction. Counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases