Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.57 OF 2015

Case between Thottukanni Marakkar's wife et al vs Babu Parammal and Musthafa regarding eviction

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-08-31
Duration
2 years 334 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petition filed by multiple petitioners seeking eviction of the tenants due to rent arrears and bonafide need for starting a supermarket and other commercial activities.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petitioners were granted the order of eviction against the respondents due to rent arrears, bonafide need, and unauthorized alterations to the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction order under Section 11(2), 11(3) and 11 (4)(ii)
Case Type
Rent Control Eviction under Kerala Building (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents failed to provide evidence to counter the claims made by the petitioners regarding rent arrears and bonafide need for eviction.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed u/s 11(2), 11(3) and 11 (4)(ii) directing the respondent to give vacant possession of the shop rooms to the petitioners within two months from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thottukanni Marakkar's wife (Age not specified years) Thrikkandiyur amsom Muthoor desom, Tirur Taluk Mariyamu (62 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom Muthoor desom, Tirur Taluk Suhara (43 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom Muthoor desom, Tirur Taluk Shamsudheen (36 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom Muthoor desom, Tirur Taluk Faisal (35 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom Muthoor desom, Tirur Taluk Fousiya (32 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom Muthoor desom, Tirur Taluk Seenath (30 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom Muthoor desom, Tirur Taluk Mashood (29 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom Muthoor desom, Tirur Taluk Musthafa (45 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom Muthoor desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Babu Parammal (Age not specified years) Calicut Industries, Payyanangadi, Tirur Taluk Musthafa (45 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom Muthoor desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction Order
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directed the respondent to give vacant possession of the shop rooms to the petitioners within two months from the date of this order.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2), 11(3) and 11 (4)(ii) directing the respondent to give vacant possession of the shop rooms to the petitioners within two months from the date of this order.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of communication regarding eviction.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Copy of Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of response to eviction notice.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Reports submitted by the Advocate Commissioner regarding alterations to the property.
Reference:
C1, C2, C3, C4

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 08/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases