Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 12 OF 2015

Case between C.M. Jameela et al vs Cholakkara Cheppale Saidalavi et al regarding eviction and damages

Court
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V., B.A, L.L.B.
Order Date
2018-02-22
Duration
Approximately 3 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner seeks eviction of respondents due to subletting, negligence, and damages to the rented building. Respondents conducted illegal activities, diminishing property value.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the eviction of respondents and directed them to vacate the building within two months due to subletting, damages, and illegal activities.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction within 2 months
Case Type
Rent Control - Eviction and Damages
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Bonafide need of the petitioner, subletting by respondents, neglect of building maintenance, illegal activities, and damage to property.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed u/s 11(3) and 11 (4)(ii) Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

C.M. Jameela (52 years) Kalathiparambil House, Veliyamkode, Gramam.P.O. - 676 579, Ponnani Taluk

Defendants

Cholakkara Cheppale Saidalavi @ Kunhu Haji (65 years) Cheriyamundam amsom desom, P.O. Cheriyamundam - 676 106, Tirur Taluk Kadiyamu (60 years) Cheriyamundam amsom desom, P.O. Cheriyamundam - 676 106, Tirur Taluk Machingal Haleema (59 years) Ponmundam amsom desom, P.O. Cheriyamundam - 676 106, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of respondents within 2 months due to subletting, damages, and illegal activities.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(3) and 11 (4)(ii) Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notices issued to the respondents and a copy of judgment in OS 162/2004.
Reference:
A1(a), A1(b), A1(c), A2(a), A2(b), A2(c), A3(a), A3(b), A3(c), A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Commission report and plan submitted as court exhibits.
Reference:
C1, C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sun, 02/22/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases