Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Restor.] 1347/2017

Case between Yusaf vs Kanara Bank regarding delay in filing petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2017-08-21
Duration
0 years, 2 months, 15 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner sought relief from exparte decree due to a genuine reason of missing court date because of a leg injury.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the application of the petitioner due to a genuine reason for missing the court date and exparte decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner's application allowed
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that there was a genuine reason for the delay in filing the petition due to the petitioner's leg injury.

Judgment Evidence:

The court found there was a sufficient reason for allowing the application.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Yusaf (45 years) Kunnathedath House, Ponmundam amsom and post

Defendants

Kanara Bank (0 years) Manager, Vilathoor Branch

Reliefs

Relief Type: Application Allowance
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Allowing petitioner's application for relief from exparte decree
Evidence:
The court found there was a sufficient reason for allowing the application.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Tue, 06/06/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases