Case Summary
The petitioner, M.Prabhakaran, sought eviction of the respondent, Kuttikkattil Aalimon, from a property inherited from his mother for personal use as a visual communication studio for his children.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction from the property for personal occupation
Case Type
Rent Control - Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioner had bonafide need of the property for a visual communication studio and the respondent's denial of the landlord-tenant relationship was not considered bonafide.
The court found that the petitioner had bonafide need of the property for a visual communication studio and the respondent's denial of the landlord-tenant relationship was not considered bonafide.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed under sections 11(2) and 11(8)...The respondent shall give vacant possession of the building to the petitioner within 2 months...
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
M.Prabhakaran (61 years)
Thrikkandiyur amdom desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Kuttikkattil Aalimon (30 years)
Mangalam amsom Koottayi desom, Tirur Taluk, Sajitha Jewellary, Tirur 676101. P.O. Tirur
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Eviction of respondent from the property for personal occupation as a visual communication studio
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under sections 11(2) and 11(8)...
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of Final decree
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Final decree partitioning the property
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Rent Agreement
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Rent agreement between respondent and Ramachandran
Reference:
B1