Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 322 OF 2016

Case between Bhaskaran vs Palakkavalappil Vattaparambil Habeeburrehman regarding realization of amount

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-08-03
Duration
1 year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Bhaskaran, aged 55, filed a suit against defendant Palakkavalappil Vattaparambil Habeeburrehman, aged 58, for the realization of an amount. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fee and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure due to the non-remittance of balance court fee and lack of representation for the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Suit for realization of amount
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for realization of amount. No balance court fee has been remitted. No application was filed. No representation for the plaintiff. Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bhaskaran (55 years) Thattamkandi House, Pachattiri amsom, Pariyapuram desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Palakkavalappil Vattaparambil Habeeburrehman (58 years) Palakkavalappil Vattaparambil House, Pachattiri amsom, Pariyapuram desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Realization of amount
Evidence:
Suit for realization of amount. No balance court fee has been remitted. No application was filed. No representation for the plaintiff. Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 08/03/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases