ORIGINAL SUIT No. 207 OF 2012

Case between Illikkal Kumaran et al vs Muttikkal Hydras Haji et al regarding permanent injunction

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B.

Order Date

2018-02-03

Duration

n/a

Judgement document from eCourt website

case_20260114_222920_batch_6967ca4c52a149.11961347_124_f822e717.pdf

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Multiple plaintiffs residing in Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, PO.Edayur filed a suit against defendants also residing in the same area seeking a permanent injunction. The court delivered the judgment exparte due to defendants' absence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Injunction refused

Case Type

Civil Suit - Permanent Injunction

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Illikkal Kumaran (77 years) Tirur Taluk, Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, PO.Edayur Kunhiparangodan @ Mani (64 years) Tirur Taluk, Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, PO.Edayur Illikkal Velu (62 years) Tirur Taluk, Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, PO.Edayur Illikkal Raman (58 years) Tirur Taluk, Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, PO.Edayur Illikkal Chirutha @ Devu (74 years) Tirur Taluk, Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, PO.Edayur Illikkal Unnooli @ Thankammu (60 years) Tirur Taluk, Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, PO.Edayur Illikkal Saraswathi (45 years) Tirur Taluk, Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, PO.Edayur

Defendants

Muttikkal Hydras Haji (62 years) Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, Via. Valanchery, Tirur Taluk Muttikkal Moideenkutty Musliyar (60 years) Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, Via. Valanchery, Tirur Taluk Muttikkal Abdu (67 years) Chemmalasseri amsom, desom & Post, Perinthalmanna Taluk Muhammed Musliar (69 years) Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, Via. Valanchery, Tirur Taluk Muttikkal Abdu's wife Kadeeja (66 years) Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, Via. Valanchery, Tirur Taluk Muttikkal Muhammed Musliyar's Children and others (Age not specified years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Refused

Description:

Suit for permanent injunction dismissed due to absence of plaintiffs

Evidence:

IA 274/2018 dismissed. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of plaintiff is called, absent. No representation.