Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 139 / 2014

Case between Ramachandramenon vs Venugopalan regarding recovery of possession and partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-07-25
Duration
3 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff sought recovery of possession and partition of joint property as per preliminary decree obtained earlier in a partition suit filed in another court. Defendants contested the maintainability of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed with costs as the plaintiff's right was already determined in a preliminary decree obtained earlier in another partition suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Suit dismissed with costs
Case Type
Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession and Partition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's right was already determined in a previous preliminary decree; hence, the suit was found to be not maintainable.

Judgment Evidence:

On going through the evidence rendered by PW1, it can be seen that he has no direct or personal knowledge with respect to the subject matter of the suit. Hence, he is not a competent person to depose on behalf of the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ramachandramenon (71 years) Kudakath House, Vadukumbram amsom, desom & Post, Valancheri, Tirur Taluk. Pin: 676 552

Defendants

Venugopalan (42 years) Manchingal veedu, Post Vadakumbram, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery of Possession
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Recovery of joint property possession
Evidence:
The suit was dismissed with costs as the plaintiff's right was already determined in a preliminary decree obtained earlier in another partition suit.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Partition of joint property
Evidence:
The suit was dismissed with costs as the plaintiff's right was already determined in a preliminary decree obtained earlier in another partition suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Preliminary decree
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's right was determined in the previous preliminary decree.
Reference:
OS. 53/2004
Document Type: Judgment in RFA
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reflects terms of the compromise where plaintiff's right was determined.
Reference:
857/2008
Document Type: Not available
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Not available
Reference:
Not available

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 07/25/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases