Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
S.T. No:50/2015

Case between Chemmannur International Jewellers vs Abdul Latheef regarding dishonour of negotiable instrument

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Judge
Smt. Vincy T.V.
Order Date
2017-06-27
Duration
2 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chemmannur International Jewellers filed a complaint against Abdul Latheef for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complaint was dismissed due to non-payment of process fee and absence of the complainant.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complaint filed by Chemmannur International Jewellers against Abdul Latheef for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of complaint
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour (Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act)
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The complaint filed by the complainant against the accused alleging commission of offense punishable u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. No process fee has been deposited even though repeated chances were given. No representation for the complainant. Complainant also absent. Hence the complaint is dismissed u/s.204(4) Cr.P.C.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Chemmannur International Jewellers (Age not specified years) M.M.Ali Road, Palayam, Proprietor, C.D.Boby S/o.Devassykutty, Aged 45 years, Villa No.8, Skyline Meadows, Sadanam road, Civil Station PO, Eranhipalam, Calicut-20.

Defendants

Abdul Latheef (41 years) Ambat Puthilath house, Vakkad, Paravanna PO, Malappuram District.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Dismissal of complaint
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Dismissal of the complaint filed by Chemmannur International Jewellers against Abdul Latheef under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act
Evidence:
No representation for the complainant. Complainant also absent. Hence the complaint is dismissed u/s.204(4) Cr.P.C.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 06/27/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases