Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 71 OF 2015

Case between GTL Infrastructure Limited et al vs Hamza et al regarding obstruction of mobile tower installation

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-06-13
Duration
1 year and 22 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

case_20260114_212041_batch_6967bae8464371.61800343_66_393735d7.pdf
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiff, a telecom company, seeking an injunction against the defendant who obstructed the installation of a mobile tower on leased property. The plaintiff alleges violations of the lease agreement regarding co-sharing infrastructure with other service providers.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful operation of the mobile tower.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent Perpetual Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant obstructed the plaintiff from co-sharing infrastructure as per the agreement, leading to a violation of the lease terms and justified the grant of the injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

The defendant and their men are hereby restrained by a permanent perpetual injunction from obstructing the plaintiff from peaceful operation of plaint schedule mobile tower and from obstructing plaintiff's employees, technicians, vendors etc. from entering into the plaint schedule mobile tower.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

GTL Infrastructure Limited (Age not specified years) Maestros House, MIDC Building No.2, Sector 2, Millennium Business Park, Mahape, Navi, Mumbai- 400701.

Defendants

Hamza (Age not specified years) Mammakanath House, Kannamkulam, B.P. Angadi Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Perpetual Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's mobile tower operations
Evidence:
The defendant and their men are hereby restrained by a permanent perpetual injunction from obstructing the plaintiff from peaceful operation of plaint schedule mobile tower and from obstructing plaintiff's employees, technicians, vendors etc. from entering into the plaint schedule mobile tower.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Letter of authority
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used as evidence of plaintiff's right to operate the mobile tower.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Sent as legal notice to the plaintiff.
Reference:
B1

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 05/27/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases