Case Summary
Petitioner seeks eviction of respondents from the schedule building for bonafide requirement and alleged subletting of the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction order and costs
Case Type
Rent Control Petition - Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated bonafide need for the property and proved subletting by the respondent.
The petitioner demonstrated bonafide need for the property and proved subletting by the respondent.
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner is entitled for an order u/s 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Tharammal Suseela (52 years)
Housing Board Colony, 19th mail, Palappuram, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad district
Defendants
M.K. Hussain (Not mentioned years)
Mavumkunnath House, Ezhoor, Tirur, Pin: 676 101
Thabseena (Not mentioned years)
Near Over Bridge, Tirur
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order to vacate the premises within two months
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled for an order u/s 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Costs awarded to the petitioner
Evidence:
The respondents are directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building within two months from today.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Rent Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed rent agreement for the property
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Registered lawyer notice and postal receipt with acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to respondents to vacate the premises
Reference:
A2
Document Type:
Registered return notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned notice indicating respondent's absence
Reference:
A3
Document Type:
Copy of Degree of Bachelor of Technology
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document attesting to skills of petitioner's daughter
Reference:
A4