Case Summary
The petitioners filed a petition for an advocate commissioner to effect property division as per the preliminary decree for partition dated 25.01.2016.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiffs
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the advocate commissioner had divided the property equitably based on the preliminary decree.
The court found that the advocate commissioner had divided the property equitably based on the preliminary decree.
Judgment Evidence:
At the request of the petitioners the Advocate Commissioner was deputed for effecting division of the property in tune with the preliminary decree for partition dated. 25.01.2016.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Nalukandathil Musthafa (44 years)
Tirur Amsom, Desom, Pookkayil, Tirur Taluk
Nalukandathil Ismail (40 years)
Tirur Amsom, Desom, Pookkayil, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Nalukandathil Noushad (42 years)
Tirur Amsom, Desom, Pookkayil, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Allotment of properties to the petitioners and respondent as per the preliminary decree
Evidence:
Final decree for partition is passed as allocated in the Ext. C1 report and Ext.C2 plan.