Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.33 OF 2016

Case between Sakkariya vs Abdullakkutty regarding tenancy dispute

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-05-31
Duration
1 year 1 month 1 day

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Sakkariya filed a petition under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act against respondent Abdullakkutty. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by the petitioner under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Petition filed by the petitioner under section 5(1) of Kerala Building (lease and rent control) Act. Counsel for the petitioner reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the petitioner is called. Absent. No representation. Hence Petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sakkariya (47 years) Tharammal House, Fathima Manzil, Rayirimangalam amsom, Tanur nagaram desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Abdullakkutty (48 years) Menothil Pooparambil House, Puthuppalli amsom, Maravantha desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Unknown
Evidence:
Unknown

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 05/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases