Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Restoration Petition 2384/2016

Case between Not mentioned vs Not mentioned regarding Restoration Petition

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-04-11
Duration
0 years, 4 months, 24 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner filed a restoration petition which was allowed on payment of a cost of Rs.4000. The petition was dismissed as the cost was not paid.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed as the cost of Rs.4000 was not paid.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Cost of Rs.4000 was not paid by the petitioner resulting in the dismissal of the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

Cost not paid. Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Not mentioned (0 years) Not mentioned

Defendants

Not mentioned (0 years) Not mentioned

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not mentioned
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Not mentioned
Evidence:
Cost not paid. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Sat, 11/19/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases