Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 393 OF 2015

Case between Rohini vs Saithu Haji et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-03-30
Duration
Approximately 1 year

Judgement document from eCourt website

case_20260114_000136_batch_69668f7e2814f7.49853751_8_9eeb057a.pdf
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rohini filed a suit for injunction against Saithu Haji et al. The court dismissed the suit due to the pending Rent Control Petition against the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for injunction due to the existence of a Rent Control Petition against the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not specified
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. Since Rent Control Petition is filed against the plaintiff for evicting him lawfully and in the written statement it is stated by the defendant that they are not intending to evict the plaintiff forcefully and in view of Rent Control Petition 73/2016 filed against this plaintiff under section 11(3) & 11(4), there is no necessity to proceed with the application. Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rohini (39 years) Thayyil Quarters, Trikandiyoor amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Saithu Haji (66 years) Chennara amsom, Perunthiruthi desom, Tirur Taluk Ameen (60 years) Trikandiyoor amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Febi (34 years) Kadavukarakath House, Chennara amsom, Perunthiruthi desom, Tirur Taluk

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 03/30/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases